๐Ÿšš gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.6/5 from 998+ reviews
Electronicsโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Junk video cameras, set of 3

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.6 out of 5(998 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$56.27
$93.78
Sale
โœ“ complimentary delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Not tested.For those who only want the parts.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift shipment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
user-friendly Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Junk video cameras, set of 3

Not tested.
For those who only want the parts.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Electronics products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 10075

Category: Electronics > Cameras & Photography > Camcorders

Original Price:$93.78 USD

Sale Price:$56.27 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.6
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9286 reviews
KG
Kevin Green โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A must-have
So far, the Junk video cameras, set of 3 performs as expected and it meets expectations.
42 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Fresno, CA 
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
terrific product
After several use, it feels solid enough and it works for me.
46 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Nashville, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
delightful Junk video cameras, set of 3
To be fair, it works well enough and it works for me.
28 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Kansas City, MO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exceeded expectations
For the price, it fits my needs and it works for me. Arrived on time.
8 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Las Vegas, NV
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Absolutely ideal
After certain use, it is practical which is good enough.
44 people found this helpful