🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 454+ reviews
Otherβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

ThinkGeek Star Wars R2-D2 Carry-On Luggage

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(454 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$250
$416.67
Sale
βœ“ complimentary delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

ThinkGeek Star Wars R2-D2 Carry-On LuggageSee Photos For Condition Shipped Insured USPS Priority Mail 18

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid Shipping
↩️
practical Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

ThinkGeek Star Wars R2-D2 Carry-On Luggage

ThinkGeek
Star Wars
R2-D2 Carry-On Luggage
See Photos For Condition

Shipped Insured USPS Priority Mail

18​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Other products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 329407

Category: Other > Travel & Luggage > Carry-On Luggage

Original Price:$416.67 USD

Sale Price:$250 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 454 reviews
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly What I Needed
At first, the ThinkGeek Star Wars R2-D2 Carry-On Luggage feels okay and I don’t regret it.
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified
6 days ago

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five Stars for ThinkGeek Star Wars R2-D2 Carry-On Luggage
The ThinkGeek Star Wars R2-D2 Carry-On Luggage meets my expectations.
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified
3 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly What I Needed
From my experience, it is practical so it’s acceptable.
JM​
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly endorse ThinkGeek Star Wars R2-D2 Carry-On Luggage
At first, the ThinkGeek Star Wars R2-D2 Carry-On Luggage is practical and it’s fine overall.​
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified
1 week ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
astonishing Quality
In daily use, the ThinkGeek Star Wars R2-D2 Carry-On Luggage is practical which is good enough.